The Weekly: U.S. Data Shows Resilience Investments Pay Back $1.86 Per Dollar
The economic losses from disasters that are not covered by insurance continue to grow, but resilience projects are generating measurable positive returns.
As climate-driven hazards accelerate, a dangerous structural misalignment has emerged: What building codes deem legally permissible to construct is increasingly at odds with what catastrophic risk models deem financially viable to insure.
Insights & ideas on resilience straight to your inbox.
Were you forwarded this email? → Subscribe here
A home in the U.S. can be fully code-compliant and still uninsurable. Every year, that gap costs the housing market the equivalent of one month's worth of new home construction to natural disasters. As climate-driven hazards accelerate, a dangerous structural misalignment has emerged: What building codes deem legally permissible to construct is increasingly at odds with what catastrophic risk models deem financially viable to insure.
This dangerous disconnect, however, also presents an opportunity for a permanent fix. By establishing a clear, science-backed standard—a "Resiliency Code" that overlays existing building codes in high-hazard areas—states can finally move fast enough to address the issue of outdated minimums and accelerating climate risks.
The Problem: Code-Compliant Doesn't Mean Climate-Safe
Traditional building codes update slowly, drawing on historical data through multi-year cycles that climate-driven disasters have long since outpaced. As a result, many newly constructed, fully code-compliant homes remain vulnerable to extreme weather.
Insurers have filled the gap, making coverage contingent on mitigation requirements that function as de facto building code requirements—setting thresholds for what is "safe enough" outside the traditional public code-adoption process. With average premiums up 24% since 2021 and roughly 1.9 million policies dropped nationwide, states are now advancing legislation targeting the physical resilience of homes. But these measures rely on insurer-led standards built on proprietary models with no public accountability or democratic oversight.
The Solution: Proactive Resiliency Codes
States don't have to cede that ground. Colorado's Wildfire Resiliency Code Board and New Jersey's Climate-Adjusted Flood Elevation standard prove that states can establish transparent, forward-looking public safety standards aligned with the same predictive science actuaries are already using. Here's what that framework could look like in practice:
Read more about how resiliency codes can align building standards with climate risk in the full article here.

Read more about insurance on The Epicenter here.
Read more about resilient public infrastructure and government solutions on The Epicenter here.
Read more about resilient real estate on The Epicenter here.
Read more about private investment on The Epicenter here.

78%
78% of wildfire structure loss in the U.S. occurred in just 2.7% of wildfire events between 2001 and 2020.
Source: CA Wildfire Fund and Science.org.
Have thoughts to share or want to add your voice to the conversation? Reach out!
The Epicenter helps decision makers understand climate risks and discover viable resilience solutions. The Epicenter is an affiliated publication of The Resiliency Company, a 501(c)3 nonprofit dedicated to inspiring and empowering humanity to adapt to the accelerating challenges of the next 100+ years.